It’s OK to be fearful of an invasive procedure. A little fear can lead to a second opinion, maybe a better one. On the other hand, a little fear shouldn’t keep you from getting checked at all. Since I have no medical training, I can’t give specific advice on what someone else should do, once they find out there is a medical concern. I can give advice on what you should do if you don’t think you have a problem, though.
If you’re 40 or older, have your physician add PSA level to your blood test at your routine checkup. Have him do a DRE. These simple things could catch a disease before it becomes life threatening.
If you’re in a high risk group, have this done before you’re 40. If you haven’t had a routine physical in a while, schedule one today!
Prostate Cancer isn’t some rare disease that happens to that other guy. It’s the second most common cancer in men and also the second leading cause of cancer death for men. In fact, one man in six will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime. I had no idea I had an enlarged prostate or high PSA level. I still have no physical symptoms whatsoever. Prostate cancer may not cause any symptoms, until it’s too late. Don’t leave it to chance.
That’s pretty much all I have for now. I’ve caught up on most everything I’ve learned in the last few months. I won’t know much more about my situation until early March. I will blog here and there as I find interesting websites or research, but probably not on a daily basis. For now, I have not been diagnosed with cancer and I hope I can report the same in future blogs. Thank you for reading and for your support!
The time and expense involved in having all these tests may seem like a lot of effort in order to avoid a biopsy. Based on what I’ve learned so far, an invasive “random” biopsy (with its associated risks) still doesn’t seem like the best course of action for me, given my results so far. Alone, PSA levels, DRE, a PCA3 test, a power doppler ultrasound or a 3T MRI scan may not be any better than a biopsy as a method to rule out cancer. Combined, I suspect they could indeed be enough to detect cancer with a reasonable degree of sensitivity. Plus, in the case of the ultrasound and MRI, they may also even be able to help guide a biopsy to a suspicious location.
There’s another reason all these tests may come in handy. Even if I don’t have cancer, I know something is up with my prostate. It might be prostatitis, it might be BPH, it might just be the way I was born. Years from now, I may start to have another prostate issue. In fact, a large number of men do get prostate cancer at some point in their lifetime. What I will have now is a baseline for PSA, PCA3 and MRI results to compare to any lab results in the future. I had hoped to have the same for ultrasound results, but that has been a disappointment so far, but I’m not sure if that is related to the physician, the ultrasound technology itself or both. Anyway, these results can also help detect changes that might be important and rule out anything that may not be of concern because it hasn’t changed much over time.
At the very least, I’ll probably have my PSA level checked every 6 months to a year. If PCA3 testing becomes more widely accepted, perhaps I will do that annually, also. If one or both of them go up significantly, then it might be time for some other action. Of course, this all depends on the results of my MRI/biopsy next month.
I was a bit discouraged about the cost of having a new, high resolution prostate MRI. $5000 is a lot of money, especially in the current economy where it could pay bills for a couple months, as layoffs are looming everywhere. There had to be something similar and less expensive in the Chicago area. With major universities like the University of Chicago, Northwestern, Loyola and the University of Illinois at Chicago, someone had to be doing it. That’s not even including the dozens of private hospitals and clinics in the area and other nearby universities like Iowa, Purdue, Wisconsin and Illinois. Still, I could find nothing on almost every kind of search I tried.
What I did find was research. Names and email addresses of urologists, radiologists and others who were doing work in prostate imaging. One of them might know someone else doing this kind of diagnostic for patients, maybe even in the Chicago area. I also contacted some local people who came up on a search of seminars in the local area, some through a great organization called UsToo. Still, nothing I could find anywhere in the midwest. The major institutions doing this type of research seem to be in Boston, New York City, San Fransisco, Houston and Maryland. Continue reading Another Bit of Good Fortune: The Frugal MRI
My philosophy is that you should always seek a second opinion if it involves major surgery, maybe a third one if the first two opinions disagree or if it’s something life threatening, like cancer. I did this for a reconstructive knee surgery back in 1994. I ended up seeing one of the premier orthopedic surgeons in the country. In retrospect, it may or may not have been worth it. My knee is fine and my recovery was quicker than the other patients doing physical therapy for the same surgery, at the same time. On the other hand, the trips to and from the University of Chicago hospital were a bit of a hassle for me and my family. Plus, it was an arthroscopic surgery that was pretty standard. I may well have gotten the same result with a local surgeon at a nearby hospital. We have done the same for my wife for a surgery on a pituitary tumor and a on herniated disc, mostly because we were not reassured at all by the first opinion. In the case of the tumor (which was benign), our trip to Northwestern University’s hospital was one of the best decisions we ever made. Going to all this work to find out if a biopsy is necessary is probably a bit extreme, but I also have in mind what the next step might be.
You can’t really get a second opinion on the internet. I suspect the legal ramifications are too great for physicians to give specific advice without a personal consultation. You can, however, get more general advice and possibly learn whether or not another professional opinion is needed. I did just this. One such resource is AllExperts.com. You can ask questions anonymously and then determine if you need to see a specialist or get another opinion. Dr. Leslie gave me some very sound advice that was very helpful to me. Medhelp is another similar resource. I’m sure there are a number of other “Ask a Urologist” or “Ask an Oncologist” type of websites on the internet that may be also helpful to men with prostate issues. You can also search for studies, research and articles by physicians. If you find an expert who has knowledge specific to your situation, you can always call their office or email them (or their assistant) to see if you can schedule a consultation or get additional information.
There’s also the old fashioned method. Continue reading Second Opinions: Trusting Your Prostate to One Physician
Last night, I had a telephone consultation with a physician I mentioned previously. He was very skeptical of my ultrasound results, having concerns with both the physician and the claimed sensitivity of the test. He believes that based on a current consensus of experts, this ultrasound technology alone is only around 20% likely to detect prostate cancer, rather than the >90% claimed by the radiologist that did the ultrasound. From what I understand, his preferred method of detecting prostate cancer is a “3 Tesla” high resolution MRI, followed (if necessary) by a biopsy guided by the MRI and ultrasound results.
He also suggests that in patients who do not exhibit cancer, he is able to diagnose prostatitis with his procedure. He has a diet and dietary supplements that can help treat prostatitis and possibly lower PSA levels if they are the result of prostatitis.
I don’t have the expertise to determine who is right or who is wrong. In all liklihood, both philosophies may have merit to some degree. It may not be unlike how there are a number of different treatments for prostate cancer, and various well-regarded urologists, oncologists and surgeons will have their own preference as to which of them is the best option. All of them have pros and cons which should be considered by the patient as carefully as possible. Ultimately, it may even come down to which opinion you trust and respect the most.
As for now, I still have some options to consider. I’m still awaiting the “partial set” of ultrasound images. I received one small, greyscale 2D image via email this morning. For $950, I sure hope there are more showing the areas of interest for future use. Any benefit of having “3D”, “4D” or “Doppler” enhancement with color are completely lost with the images I received so far.
I had my ultrasound yesterday. I flew to New York City to get it. The only physican that I could find who was closer and used similar technology for my situation was near Detroit, but they wanted to do a biopsy at the same time. There are a number of other places doing these sonograms across the country. New York had the advantage that I would get to visit a few good friends on my overnight visit.
I didn’t know much about the physician, Dr. Robert L. Bard, beyond a few brief email exchanges, some Google searches, and a quick check at the New York state health department to make sure he was a currently licensed physician (he was indeed a licensed radiologist with no complaints listed). Probably a little extreme to check this, but if I’m flying out-of-state to see someone for a medical procedure, I want to at least make sure I know they are legitimate and not just a website scam or something! Continue reading My Super(?) Ultrasound
Tests like the PCA3, Power Doppler Ultrasound and 3T MRI are all very promising and based on a lot of research. There are a few other tests I’ve found that might be of interest. I haven’t found much research on them, and they are probably not yet available in the USA outside of trials or studies.
http://www.clarientinc.com/Default.aspx?tabid=403 (post biopsy test)
I’m off to New York City for a power doppler ultrasound. More next week.
Last week I mentioned my PCA test results. Here is a copy of the report from Bostwick Laboratories.
I have not yet been able to find a “calculator” that gives you a risk based on your PCA3 score, as there are for PSA levels. I have found some interesting webpages and studies about results that may be of help to anyone considering a PCA3 test, because of concerns about a biopsy or repeat biopsy– Continue reading More on PCA3 Prostate Cancer Urine Test
Here are a few websites that have helped me. I’ve added them to my blogroll links and hope they might help you, too:
There are also a number of smaller blogs (like mine) and personal webpages about prostate health issues that you can find on Google. One in particular is about a man who learned he had Prostate Cancer at 41 Years Old. A story I read with great interest, being the same age. As for many of the others, it’s hard to recommend them individually, because it’s difficult to contact them to see who is behind the blog. Is it a person? Is it a company? Is it a medical institution? Is it just one of those fake advertising portals? Is it legitimate? Continue reading Other Resources on Prostate Cancer and Health
I have become more concerned about having a biopsy, given the alternatives I have found, like PCA3 and ultrasound. I continue my search for information and options. I found a couple websites where I was able to contact other urologists, who basically shared the same view. One suggested I might consider an extended course of antibiotics to see if I had a chronic prostate infection (Prostatitis) before doing a biopsy. When asked about the PCA3 test or other possible diagnostics, he thought they would be interesting, but not conclusive, and would not be as reliable as a biopsy. My question still remained. Could a combination of other non-invasive methods be used before an invasive biopsy to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsy procedures done on men like me, with no compelling indicator for cancer? Continue reading Another Consultation: Finding a Like Mind On Biopsies With Google